A reality check on NEP 2020 — four years in, 250 million students later. Not from a policy desk. From a classroom in Chennai.
The Promise
On July 29, 2020, India did something extraordinary.
After 34 years of silence, the Government of India released a brand new National Education Policy — NEP 2020. It was ambitious, sweeping, and remarkably forward-thinking. It called for the end of rote learning. It mandated experiential, competency-based education. It talked about hands-on learning, critical thinking, and preparing students for a world that hadn’t been built yet.
The world took notice. UNESCO praised it. EdTech investors flew in. Educators dared to feel hopeful.
Four years later, I want to give NEP 2020 an honest report card.
Not from a policy desk. From a classroom in Chennai.
What NEP 2020 Actually Said
Let me be fair to the policy first, because it deserves that.
NEP 2020 explicitly stated that India must move away from “rote-based learning” and toward “higher-order thinking skills.” It named Bloom’s Taxonomy directly — asking that students be taken from simply recalling facts (Level 1–2) to applying, analysing, evaluating, and creating (Levels 3–6).
It called for experiential learning as a core pedagogy, not an afterthought. It demanded vocational education integrated from Grade 6 onward. It required skill development aligned to real-world industry needs, a flexible multidisciplinary curriculum that reduces exam pressure, and a National Curriculum Framework that reflects how children actually learn.
“On paper, NEP 2020 is arguably the most progressive education policy written by any developing nation in the last two decades. So what happened?”
The Classroom Report Card
Here is what has not changed in most Indian classrooms since 2020.
The blackboard is still the primary teaching tool. Walk into any of India’s 1.5 million schools today — government or private, urban or rural — and you will find a teacher at the front, chalk in hand, writing content that students copy into notebooks.
The exam is still the finish line. Despite NEP’s call for continuous, competency-based assessment, the Board Exam remains the single most powerful force shaping what gets taught and how. Teachers teach to the test. Students memorise to pass.
Bloom’s Level 2 is still the ceiling. In a survey conducted across schools in Tamil Nadu, the vast majority of classroom activities fell into the “recall” and “understand” categories. Application, analysis, evaluation, creation — the skills that actually prepare students for careers and life — were rare.
The ASER Report keeps saying the same thing. Year after year, the Annual Status of Education Report documents a disturbing finding: millions of students who have completed five or more years of schooling cannot read a simple paragraph or solve a two-digit subtraction problem. We are producing students who have attended school, but not students who have learned.
India spends approximately 4.4% of GDP on education. NEP 2020 itself targets 6%. The gap in funding is real — but the gap in pedagogy is larger.
The Vocational Catastrophe No One Talks About
If the K–12 story is sobering, the vocational training story is a crisis.
India has set an audacious goal: skill 500 million workers by 2030 under the National Skills Development Corporation. This is not aspirational — it is existential. By 2025, India will have the world’s largest working-age population. Without skilled workers, that demographic dividend becomes a demographic disaster.
Here is where we stand: approximately 5% of India’s workforce has received any form of formal vocational training. In Germany, that number is 75%. In South Korea, 96%. In Japan, 80%.
India has roughly 15,000 Industrial Training Institutes (ITIs) with 2.4 million seats. But industry leaders — from automotive to construction to manufacturing — consistently report that ITI graduates are not job-ready. The training is theoretical. The assessments are paper-based. Students learn to draw a circuit diagram but not to wire a panel. They learn to describe a process but not to execute it.
NEP 2020 specifically called for vocational education to be integrated from Grade 6 — recognising that the divide between “academic” and “vocational” tracks is artificial and damaging. Yet most schools still treat vocational subjects as the option for students who “couldn’t make it” academically.
“A country with 500 million workers who need skills, and a training system that cannot deliver them at the quality the economy demands.”
Why the Gap Persists
This is not a question of intent. Policymakers, educators, and parents in India all want better outcomes. The gap persists for three structural reasons.
1. Teacher training has not caught up. You cannot ask teachers to deliver experiential learning when they were trained in chalk-and-talk. The average Indian teacher has never experienced Bloom’s Levels 3–6 as a learner themselves. You cannot teach what you have not lived.
2. The infrastructure assumption is wrong. Most EdTech solutions built in response to NEP 2020 assumed schools had reliable internet, devices per student, and technical support staff. Most schools in India have none of these. The policy was progressive; the solutions were built for a different country.
3. Assessment reform hasn’t followed. If the exam still tests recall, teachers will teach recall. Experiential learning cannot survive inside an assessment system that doesn’t value it. NEP 2020 called for assessment reform; implementation has been slow and uneven.
What “Experiential Learning” Actually Means
I want to be precise here, because this phrase has been co-opted by marketing teams selling tablets.
Experiential learning is not watching a video. It is not clicking through an interactive PDF. It is not a gamified quiz.
Experiential learning is when a student’s body is involved in the act of knowing. When they physically manipulate, gesture, construct, or simulate the concept they are studying. When the learning happens in the doing, not in the receiving.
The neuroscience is clear: kinesthetic and spatial engagement activates different memory encoding pathways than passive reading or listening. Information learned through physical interaction is retained longer, recalled more accurately, and transferred more readily to new contexts.
This is not new knowledge. Jerome Bruner wrote about enactive learning in 1966. Maria Montessori built an entire pedagogy on it in the early 1900s. What is new is our ability to bring this kind of learning into a standard classroom — without a specialised lab, without expensive equipment, without disrupting the school day.
And this is precisely the gap that NEP 2020 identified but could not, by itself, fill.
The Path Forward
NEP 2020 was right about the destination. It was less specific about the vehicle.
Here is what I believe the path forward looks like — in both K–12 and vocational training.
In schools: The infrastructure already exists. Every school in India has a room, a wall, and a teacher. What is missing is a learning layer — technology that transforms the classroom environment itself into an interactive, gesture-driven space without requiring additional hardware per student. One projector, one depth-sensing camera, one software layer — and a Grade 10 student can physically explore the human heart, trace blood flow with their hands, and build understanding through doing.
We ran our first pilot of exactly this in April 2026 at The Rajavva Academy in Chennai. Thirteen Grade 10 students. Self-reported comprehension of the human heart jumped 34% in a single session. Eleven of thirteen rated the experience above 4 out of 5. Every single student wanted more subjects taught this way. That is not a feature. That is proof that the gap is closable.
In vocational training: The same principle applies. A trainee painter in an ITI does not need to waste expensive materials to learn technique. A trainee welder does not need to burn through metal to understand heat distribution. Simulation-based training — where the trainee uses a real tool instrumented with sensors and receives real-time feedback — can compress the skill acquisition curve dramatically while reducing waste, cost, and safety risk.
NEP 2020 asked for this. The technology to deliver it exists. What remains is implementation at scale.
The Real Report Card
NEP 2020 gets an A for vision and a C for implementation — and that is not entirely the policy’s fault.
Systemic change in education is slow. Teacher retraining takes years. Assessment reform requires political will. Infrastructure investment has to be sustained, not announced.
But here is what I have come to believe after building in this space: the classroom will not change from the top down. It will change school by school, teacher by teacher, session by session — as educators see with their own eyes what happens when students stop being passive recipients of information and become active participants in knowledge.
India’s 250 million school students and 500 million workers deserve a learning system that matches the ambition of NEP 2020.
Four years in, the blackboard is still king.
That is the problem we are here to solve.
Elango Raghupathy is the Founder & CEO of Karkei Experiential Technologies Private Limited (CIN: U62099TN2026PTC191885) — India’s first projection-based spatial learning platform for K–12 schools and vocational institutions. Karkei’s SPARK methodology aligns with NCERT, CBSE, State Board curricula, and NEP 2020. Based in Chennai, Tamil Nadu.
Explore Karkei: karkei.com · YouTube · X / Twitter